If a man meets every requirement asked of him and yet he receives no support or encouragement for being honest with his beliefs while others strayed far from the truth to obtain their convictions, wouldn't it be logical to conclude his only recourse is to execute the unexpected? For when his truthful actions have no impact on understanding, doesn't it make sense to try something else if just for the sake of arguing the outcome: follow the right reasons…or do the right things. Why allow wrong things to prevail if hopelessness and despair are the ultimate consequence, i.e. does a win-lose situation ever make sense?
Who has the answers?
No comments:
Post a Comment